27 Best Deep-Sea Species #16: Red-eyed gaper Chaunax

Redeye_gaper_600

Meet the red-eyed gaper, Chaunax sp., more commonly known as "by-catch" in commercial fishery operations. Gapers are Lophiformes, in the anglerfish group, with big heads, a network of open sensory canals,
and a lateral canal extending posteriorly along a compressed trunk and tail. They are sit-and-wait, ambush predators.

If Dr. Seuss’ s original environmental story "The Lorax" had been
called "The Chaunax," the narrative would have been slightly different, with bottom trawl fisheries mowing down deep-sea corals to catch fish rather than foresters mulching Truffala trees to make fancy pajamas. Chaunax is like the Lorax of the Sea.

These red-eyed gapers and their ilk can be found as deep as 2000 m around the world. Here, one sits and waits for the robot to go away in 250 m of water in the Gulf of Mexico. The Tree of Life webpage has more information. This NOAA Ocean Explorer post by Doug Weaver describes deep fish in general. The video below aired here three weeks ago when Chaunax made his debut.- PJE

Photo credit Lophelia II 2008: Deepwater Coral Exedition: Reefs, Rigs, and Wrecks.


Peter Etnoyer (397 Posts)

PhD candidate at Texas A&M University- Corpus Christi and doctoral fellow Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies.


3 Replies to “27 Best Deep-Sea Species #16: Red-eyed gaper Chaunax”

  1. David, no problem! I tried putting my email address up but got reprimanded by my overlords and fellow bloggers. The blog is a forum as good as any though and others can join the conversation!

    That is a wierd squid, genus Magnapinna. We’ve discussed it before here: http://scienceblogs.com/deepseanews/2008/08/one_question_squid_quiz.php Check out the comment thread too. You can feel free to continue the comments here if you want since we do not check our old site anymore. Thanks for reading!

  2. I have to say I love seeing all these fishes :-) Are you going to do the jawless eel??? I mean any fish that has a fang + possible poison gland has to be in there somewhere…….

Comments are closed.